BeNewz
Related Articles
Aftab Maken
ISLAMABAD: Oil and Gas Development Company Limited (OGDC) announced its highest-ever cash dividend for FY2025-26, but a closer reading of the accounts filed with the Pakistan Stock Exchange and London Stock Exchange shows the headline payout masks a year in which OGDC rising costs ate deeply into operating performance, exploration write-offs surged, and the quality of profit growth came largely from a one-off tax swing rather than the core business.
The Board, meeting in Islamabad, recommended a final cash dividend of Rs 6 per share (60 percent), on top of interim payouts of Rs 11 per share (110 percent) already disbursed during the year — taking total distributions for FY26 to Rs 68.81 billion, up from Rs 60.43 billion a year earlier. Books close from October 09 to October 16, 2026, ahead of the AGM scheduled for October 16.
Background: A Profit Number That Doesn’t Tell the Full Story
On paper, OGDC’s net profit rose sharply to Rs 242.37 billion from Rs 169.90 billion, a jump that looks impressive until the tax line is examined. The company’s effective tax rate collapsed to roughly 6.5 percent in FY26 from close to 39 percent in FY25 — taxation fell to Rs 16.76 billion from Rs 109.41 billion even though pre-tax profit was essentially flat, edging down from Rs 279.31 billion to Rs 259.13 billion. In other words, nearly all of the reported profit growth is attributable to a favourable tax outcome rather than stronger underlying operations, a pattern OGDC rising costs in the operating base makes harder to sustain going forward.
Beneath the tax line, the operating picture is weaker than the headline suggests. Revenue grew a modest 12 percent to Rs 449.19 billion, but gross profit rose only 6.5 percent to Rs 246.76 billion, as royalty, operating expenses and transportation charges together climbed to Rs 202.43 billion. Operating expenses alone jumped 23 percent year-on-year, from Rs 120.20 billion to Rs 147.69 billion, meaning costs are growing roughly twice as fast as revenue — a classic sign of margin erosion that OGDC rising costs best captures.
Exploration spending tells a similarly troubling story. Exploration and prospecting expenditure surged 53 percent, from Rs 18.77 billion to Rs 28.78 billion, while the cost of dry and abandoned wells — money spent on wells that yielded nothing — rose 45.5 percent to Rs 6.16 billion from Rs 4.23 billion. General and administration expenses climbed 47 percent to Rs 11.06 billion. At the same time, finance and other income, a major swing factor in the company’s bottom line in past years, fell 33.5 percent to Rs 54.39 billion from Rs 81.82 billion, removing a cushion that had previously offset cost pressure.
The strain also shows up in the cash flow statement. Capital expenditure rose nearly 48 percent to Rs 108.20 billion, and net cash used in investing activities swung to a negative Rs 2.43 billion, compared with a positive Rs 4.93 billion generated in FY25 — the company is now spending more on investing activities than it is bringing in. Trade debts, meanwhile, remain a persistent overhang: receivables stood at Rs 594.85 billion at year-end, only marginally down from Rs 613.66 billion, underlining the sector’s long-standing circular-debt problem and the risk it poses to OGDC’s cash generation.
Public and Investor Reaction
Reaction on investor forums and social media platforms since the announcement has been mixed rather than celebratory. While retail shareholders welcomed the record cash payout, several market commentators flagged that the dividend is being funded even as operating costs, exploration write-offs and dry-well losses climb, questioning whether the current payout level is sustainable if the low effective tax rate proves temporary. Some users also pointed to the still-massive trade debt figure as a recurring concern that headline dividend news tends to obscure.
Analyst Assessment
Market analysts tracking the exploration and production sector note that OGDC rising costs across operating expenses, exploration spending and administration outlays is the more important story in this result set than the dividend itself. Analysts caution that a sharp, one-off drop in the effective tax rate flattered net profit and earnings per share (which rose to Rs 56.35 from Rs 39.50), and that investors should look past the EPS growth to the underlying gross-margin compression.
The rise in dry-well write-offs is also seen as a signal of lower exploration success rates during the year, while the swing to negative investing cash flow suggests the company’s elevated capital spending is not yet being matched by proportionate returns. Continued high trade debts are flagged as an ongoing liquidity risk tied to the broader energy sector’s payment chain in Pakistan.
Key Figures — FY26 vs FY25 (Rs ‘000)
| Metric | FY2026 | FY2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue | 449,190,752 | 401,177,969 | +12.0% |
| Gross profit | 246,763,886 | 231,607,939 | +6.5% |
| Operating expenses | 147,693,389 | 120,196,643 | +22.9% |
| Exploration & prospecting expenditure | 28,780,511 | 18,766,791 | +53.4% |
| Cost of dry & abandoned wells | 6,160,917 | 4,233,127 | +45.5% |
| General & admin expenses | 11,063,481 | 7,514,990 | +47.2% |
| Finance and other income | 54,385,326 | 81,821,097 | −33.5% |
| Taxation | 16,761,223 | 109,411,247 | −84.7% |
| Net profit | 242,373,646 | 169,903,614 | +42.7% |
| Net cash from/(used in) investing activities | (2,427,587) | 4,930,621 | Swung negative |
| Trade debts (year-end) | 594,845,141 | 613,660,983 | −3.1% |
